Home
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • Research Project
    • Research Phases
    • Research Partners
    • Project Staff
    • Validation Panel
    • About the Website
  • Embedded Instruction
    • What is EIEL?
    • Research Evidence
    • Steps of EIEL
    • Learning Trials
    • Instruction Procedures
    • Materials & Resources
    • Links
  • Professional Development
    • What is PD?
    • Why focus on PD?
    • PD in this project
    • Links
  • Presentations & Products
  • Tools for Families
  • Tools for Teachers
  • Graphing Tool

Instructional Procedures for Embedded Instruction

Instructional procedures are taken from a variety of possible methods designed to use Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence sequences (complete learning trials) to promote learning. These include:

1. Antecedent Methods: procedures that occur before the student responds

Stimulus Prompts or Stimulus modification: manipulating relevant stimuli to increase correct responding

  • Universal curricular modifications*
  • Targeted curricular modifications*

Response Prompts: action taken by the teacher before a student responds (or after error) to increase correct responding

  • Naturalistic instructional procedures *
  • Prompting/ prompting fading strategies*

2. Consequence Methods: procedures that occur after the student responds

  • Feedback/consequence strategies*
abc blocks 
Examples of Procedures:

Universal curricular modifications*

  • Alter the environment (physical, social, temporal)
  • Modify the materials (size, accessibility)
  • Modify the instructional media (paper/pencil to computer)
  • Alter the task or activity (duration, difficulty, or size)

Targeted curricular modifications *

  • Use child preferences
  • Interesting materials
  • Out of reach materials
  • Inadequate portions
  • Making choices
  • Unexpected situations
  • Use specialized equipment

Naturalistic instructional procedures*

  • Incidental Teaching
  • Mand-Model
  • Milieu Teaching

Prompting/ prompting fading strategies*

  • System of Least Prompts (SLP) (increasing assistance)
  • Most to Least Prompts (MLP) (decreasing assistance)
  • Constant Time Delay (wait time with help)

Feedback/consequence strategies*

  • Reinforcement
  • Error correction
  • Shaping (successive approximations)
  • Chaining (sequences of behaviors)

 

For more information on instructional procedures see:

Sandall, S., & Schwartz, S. (2002). Building block for teaching preschoolers with special needs. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Snell, M., & Brown, F. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. New Jersey: Pearson

Wolery, M., Ault, M., & Doyle, P. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. New York: Longman.

[back to top]

This project is a collaboration among faculty at the University of Florida, Vanderbilt University, University of Washington, and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The project is funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) Project Number R324A070008. The opinions expressed, however, do not reflect the official position or policy of the US Department of Education. Copyright 2009 © Embedded Instruction for Early Learning. All rights reserved.